<Order DETECT or Books> <Home Page> <Info. Page> <Contact us: Info@levelsofanalysis.com>
Tutorial for Single-Level Analysis
(After viewing the pdf files, use the back button on your browser to return
to this page.)
(To select another tutorial click here)
Illustration of Parts:
Schriesheim, C., Neider, L. and Scandura, T (1998). Delegation and leader-member
exchange. Academy of Management Journal, 41, 298-318.
Illustration of Equivocal:
Schriesheim, C., Cogliser,C., and Neider, L. (1995). Is it "trustworthy." A
multiple levels of analysis reexamination of an Ohio State leadership study.
Leadership Quarterly, 6, 111-145.
Illustration of Inexplicable:
Yammarino, F. and Markham, S. (1992). On the application of within and between
analysis: Are absence and affect really group based. Journal of Applied Psychology,
77, 168-176.
For a nonquantative discussion of single-level analysis see:
Klein, K., Dansereau, F., and Hall, R. J. (1994). Levels issues in theory
development, data collection, and analysis. Academy of Management Review,
19, 195-229.
For a discussion of the above published studies see:
Dansereau, F. and Yammarino, F. (2000). Within and between analysis: The varient
paradigm as an underlying approach to theory building. In K. Klein and S. Kozlowski
(Eds.) Multilevel Theory, Research and Methods in Organizations (425-466).
San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
A note about DETECT
DETECT's practical significance indicators ( such as Cohen's eta squared) are compatible with the 1999 report of the American Psychological Association Task Force on Statistical Significance that effect sizes should "always" be reported along with p values, and that "reporting and interpreting effect sizes in the context of previously reported effects is essential to good research" (p. 599)
<Order DETECT or Books> <Home Page> <Info. Page> <Contact us: Info@levelsofanalysis.com>