<Order DETECT or Books> <Home Page> <Info. Page> <Contact us: Info@levelsofanalysis.com>

Tutorial for Single-Level Analysis

(After viewing the pdf files, use the back button on your browser to return to this page.)
(To select another tutorial click here)

 

Overview

Single-level analysis is described in six pdf files in different ways.
Click on the file below that you prefer and scroll through the material to get a feeling for single-level analysis.
 


Data Set A


DETECT Program

DETECT for Windows® uses windows to tell DETECT what analyses to perform. All the windows available in DETECT are described in the manual. The manual uses single-level analysis and data set A as an example and all the other analyses follow. The actual program generated by DETECT for windows for this analysis is listed at the beginning of the output listed below.


Output


Interpretation


A selection of published studies with real data using single-level analysis

Illustration of Wholes:
Dansereau, F., Yammarino, F., Markham S., Alutto J., Newman J., Dumas M., Nachman S., Naughton, T, Kim, K, Al-Kelabi, A., Lee S., and Keller, T.(1995). Individualized leadership: A new multiple level approach. Leadership Quarterly, 6, 413-450.

Illustration of Parts:
Schriesheim, C., Neider, L. and Scandura, T (1998). Delegation and leader-member exchange. Academy of Management Journal, 41, 298-318.

Illustration of Equivocal:
Schriesheim, C., Cogliser,C., and Neider, L. (1995). Is it "trustworthy." A multiple levels of analysis reexamination of an Ohio State leadership study. Leadership Quarterly, 6, 111-145.

Illustration of Inexplicable:
Yammarino, F. and Markham, S. (1992). On the application of within and between analysis: Are absence and affect really group based. Journal of Applied
Psychology, 77, 168-176.

For a nonquantative discussion of single-level analysis see:
Klein, K., Dansereau, F., and Hall, R. J. (1994). Levels issues in theory development, data collection, and analysis. Academy of Management Review, 19, 195-229.

For a discussion of the above published studies see:
Dansereau, F. and Yammarino, F. (2000). Within and between analysis: The varient paradigm as an underlying approach to theory building. In K. Klein and S. Kozlowski (Eds.) Multilevel Theory, Research and Methods in Organizations (425-466). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

A note about DETECT

DETECT's practical significance indicators ( such as Cohen's eta squared) are compatible with the 1999 report of the American Psychological Association Task Force on Statistical Significance that effect sizes should "always" be reported along with p values, and that "reporting and interpreting effect sizes in the context of previously reported effects is essential to good research" (p. 599)

<Order DETECT or Books> <Home Page> <Info. Page> <Contact us: Info@levelsofanalysis.com>